*Blog post started on December 17, 2020.
I
guess life is just boring. It could be doing my best to follow social
distancing protocols. It could be me needing to lay off the booze to
show my PA that I have been trying to be healthier. When I have been on
my own for the past month, how else am I expected to create any
excitement?
The
lack of opportunities to socialize has been driving me mad. My latest
tattoo ideas have been the cheery ode to Wax Trax Records's best German
signee, KMFDM (Kittens Make For Deadly Minions) and one that will state
"Fuck Serenity". It is not an anti-Whedon (I suppose that would be
warrant the "FYR" idea idea I have been working on) just an expression
of displeasure that my best friend's grave has the "Serenity Prayer" on a
cross that was placed there.
This
may stem from me not being religious anymore and the belief she was not
faith dependent either. Perhaps she became that way after she tried to
fight her demons, but she ended up succumbing to them anyhow. Where was
the fucking power then you cloud-riding asshole?
What
can be said is that I am longing for tangible chaos. My cats can only cause so
much trouble. Some hairballs and a few spilled drinks is all I am getting. 409
makes those challenges too easy for me. The moment I became calm when I
was trying to make sure my friend was safe was the moment when her
illness took her. If there is nothing for me to fight for, what is the
point of living? How long can one remain content?
I
suppose that is not the perspective of a grown up. My only
responsibilities are my cats and my bills. Grown ups have kids that they
need to see to adulthood so that they may receive grandchildren to
spoil. The point is, you are always working for something when you are a
parent, so you shall not find many moments when there is not a fight.
As someone focusing of creative and social goals, not being able to
pursue any sucks.
Do
I envy those who have surrendered their freedom to the young? I envy
the tangible relationships with partners, but their path, no. Parenthood
is something I think you must want. It is an easier path to immortality,
but I know enough bastards who would like their kids to not know about
their previous generation.
If
we think about the memory element of existence, those without kids are
trying to obtain memory on a grander scale. Or at least they better be.
Then again, I suppose being the town drunk could make one known for a
couple of generations beyond them. It might be why my family has never
truly supported me in my wrestling exploits. That lacks something
tangible for them as the most they got from it was me being mentioned in
"Wrestle America" magazine.
Or
they saw a few matches of mine in Peoria, and realized that I had not
been trained by Norman "Apocolypse" Callaway to be memorable. I was his
website designer, so he thought it was privilege for me to be allowed in
the ring. He does not need to look cool and he is a mark for pursuing a
career in the business anyhow. Learning anything memorable from him
would be impossible and would also question why he was at the top of the
card regardless if he had the pen. I could get personal with his life's
decisions when I knew him, but I do not know the man now to see if it
worked out.
The
top of the card is where the story is at, and that is why Next
Generation Wrestling (and later Midwest Impact Pro) was not very
memorable. Peoria could not come up with the original story lines to
warrant long drawn out matches. If you came back, it was because of
those on the undercard who questionably sold and relied on ...dive.
Why
does the "Quit Diving!" argument come up in quadrennial cycles? Randy
Orton seems to have mellowed out since 2016. Perhaps it was the MMA
elbows from Brock Lesnar knocking the saltiness out of him. Lesnar seems
to love to work with the flippy guys more than heavyweights. If Jon
Moxley offered some more small guy offense, Brock may have gotten excited
to work him at WrestleMania 32.
I did not want the Disgruntled's Real Championship Wrestling
blog to become an AEW fan site (Unless the Impact and NWA involvement
requires the DRCW sanctioning body to replace all these extra belts), but with AEW being the only indie
style out there (Sorry Ring of Honor. You might want to start dropping
ads during local news broadcasts on Sinclair.) that is always fresh
(Crowd-free wrestling cannot be aired, look at the pre-Thunderdome
ratings.). Because all the best indie talent is showing up there, you
have to expect...dive and selling without embellishment. With that being
established, can Jim Ross really be complaining about this style not
being his kind of realistic?
With
divisive electoral politics being pushed out the locker room, maybe Jim
Ross needs to have something for the boys to get frustrated with. All
of Orton's ...dive talk was before Trump's presidency.
Is
AEW's style really realistic? I would say yes on most levels. The main
events tend to be long drawn out wars. Every move counts so much more,
so you do not see as many HIGH spots when compared to the undercard.
Main event implies the best are competing, so they should also be the
wisest. If everyone is wrestling the same style, their wisdom allows
them to work around the flashy moves. Their challengers best be aware of
that and save the big spots. Kenny Omega is a little too happy with his
V-Trigger, but otherwise, a finisher is a finisher.
You
know Kenny Omega is not going to win with one V-Trigger. He is going to
win with the One-Winged Angel. Paul Heyman said it best on the Stone
Cold Podcast. If you do not see some one kick out of a sparingly used
move, the move is more valuable. All AEW has been doing is changing what
moves are important. Jake Roberts is still working there despite the
overuse of the DDT. If he starts bitching about its lack of
effectiveness, then I arguing against it not being a finisher may be
valid. Anyhow, no one hits a DDT like The Snake (or Raven).
Stay out of Eddie Kingston's ring JR.
Until
you realize who the main eventers are and are not, then you realize
where the flippy shit can occur. You should be expecting inexperienced
performers in ANY sport to be trying to do too much. That is what make
the sport exciting. There are a lot of moves that you do not want
children hitting each other with, but it TV-14 so if your kid nails
another kid with a Canadian Destroyer, kudos for his ability to shoot
spike a child like that, but the fault falls upon you.
With
that said about the Destroyer, it is an unrealistic move, so kicking
out of that is acceptable on those grounds. But back to the concept of
realism, as long as the team has one move which is more brutal than
their others and it gets the win, is that not what the sport's structure
was founded on?
Because
of this, if you win the match after a dive to the floor, that would be
bullshit. Thankfully, I have yet to see that happen. So why are we
complaining Jim? Is it because we need that voice of dissent and
Cornette is persona-non-grada?
Wrestling
is spectacle on television. The dive into 13 people is spectacular. A
few more punches thrown while the crowd coils up, bitching about realism
can be made redundant.
My
final argument for the current style is my fledgling love of mixed
martial arts. When I spell out MMA, I realize my love may have been for
No Holds Barred (which pro-wrestling needs to realize NHB does mean weapons
should be barred). Once I started training as a pro-wrestler, my time to devote
watching that sport was greatly diminished. That did not really matter
because it was nothing like the sport I had grown up with.
Until
UFC 4, Gracie vs. Severns, matches did not go longer than five minutes
(at least fights that were aired). That is because real fights do not
last longer than that. If you cannot game plan an opponent, you throw
whatever you have at them and hope something sticks. The counter
argument is that you can plan for any opponent with the internet, but
every match on the card cannot be a methodical, slow-paced fight.
Wrestling can guarantee that. MMA cannot.
Once
the sport became about cross-training and considering judges' opinions, the sport
lost its charm to me. Styles make fights. That is the same in
professional wrestling. How is the super heavyweight going to catch the
high flyer? How is Bret Hart going to get Yokozuna to tap out to the
Scorpion Deathlock? Which is better: Flips or Fists?
I
loved to watch Pride and Dream because of the showmanship and the
undercards were going to offer you something totally different than the
main event. If everyone is practicing the same style, every fight can
end up being the same. In MMA, you cannot throw a different top rope
move into each match to place a stamp on it.
In
the end, it all comes down to the booker. If they place too many
similar bouts together, you have a right to be upset and to change the
channel (or unsubscribe to their streaming service). AEW has been able
to avoid that with the exception of "Dark", but that is more of an issue
of the large volume of similar matches. Right now, the state of
Wednesday Night Wrestling is good. I would say thanks for the warning
Mr. Ross of where wrestling can end up, but I think you are just
nostalgic for the style you broke in with.
It
is not necessarily nostalgia for a style. I think it might be a
yearning to see the legendary matches again. Those are not going to
happen. Let Steve Williams defeating Big Bubba Rogers be its own thing
and do not expect performers 35 years removed from that try and replace
it.
With
that said, has anyone tried starting a promotion where the classic
matches are recreated move for move? I think it may encourage newer fans
who do not want to spend $9.99 to support a company otherwise funded by
Saudi blood money (As a Newcastle United fan, it feels good that I am
not a hypocrite with that statement.) might want to look back into the
history of the sport if there was an event like that. They can find new performers to be inspired by...
Until they learn about the cancel culture moments. That does not stop me from proposing Benoit Pro Wrestling.